Tuesday, April 7, 2020

Extremely wrinkly cat steals hearts thanks to its extraordinary appearance

A Sphynx cat covered in an exceptional amount of wrinkles has left the internet amazed.
Six-year-old feline Xherdan from Rüt in Switzerland is covered in wrinkles from head to toe, leaving users on the web comparing him to a variety of things, including a caterpillar, an alien, a brain and a dumpling.
Xherdan is also well-known for his frown, but owner Sandra Filippi (47) says he’s a sweet cat who loves to “sleep and talk”.
“When I first saw him, he immediately stole my heart,” Sandra said.
“His wrinkled pink skin, as fine as a peach, and his turquoise eyes . . . I was in love!
“He’s had this many wrinkles since the day he was born.
“Xherdan is a very active cat and he talks a great deal, in all pitches, when he’s excited, when he’s hungry, when he plays or while cuddling and falling asleep. He’s like a child and his character is lovely.”
According to the doting owner, people are initially scared of the furless feline, but fall in love with him when they find out how playful he actually is.
Sandra also says that like most Sphynxes, Xherdan requires a lot of care to stay healthy and happy.
“I regularly clean his eyes, ears, and feet. Even the claws I have to cut,” she said.
“Sphynxes take up a lot of time. They always want to be where their humans are. That should not be underestimated.
“Xherdy makes me and other people laugh, and that’s the most beautiful thing there is.
“Most people are a bit scared of Xherdan, but then when they meet him they love him!”








What does no one tell you about coronavirus?

People are mainly thinking about lungs with COVID-19, but the virus may be capable of shutting down your breathing through infecting the neurons in your brain. It is able to do this because it's a neurotropic virus. That means it invades and spreads through your nerve tissue.






































It enters through receptors in your lungs into the brainstem where the cardiorespiratory centre is- the part of your brain that regulates your blood pressure and breathing. This may explain why some patients experience respiratory failure despite having little viral infection in their lungs.
Here comes another issue with herd immunity that I don’t see many people discussing.
Viruses that invade nerve tissue have been implicated in long term health conditions. If COVID-19 is allowed to spread through most of the population, I predict there to be a tidal wave of chronic illness. Not only reduced lung function as I have seen being mentioned, but also diseases such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.
Neurotropic viruses are also able to lay dormant and possibly reactivate (chickenpox definitely does but others may as well). Some viral infections may never completely clear. Scientists are not sure whether this is due to viral reactivation, or the virus triggering a permanent altered state in areas of metabolic processes, immunity and neurological functioning.
No one knows if this will happen to COVID-19 patients, but if we look at longitudinal studies of SARS patients, it’s not encouraging. There are long term health problems in a small but significant percentage. Not just breathing issues, but anxiety, depression and fatigue years after they had recovered. Any infection can trigger long-term effects of course. However bacteria, viruses and proteins that are neurotropic can overcome neural barriers and get inside your central nervous system. It's scary when you think about it.
QASIMALIVIP

Saturday, September 19, 2015

samsung galaxy j7, samsung galaxy j5

Samsung Reveals Pricing for 
Galaxy J5 and J7 Smartphones

Monday, August 12, 2013

The OFF Pocket: Hiding Your Phone in Plain Sight

Note from Artem: Mark Murphy, also known as CommonsWare and CommonsGuy, is one of the top 10 contributors to StackOverflow (he's currently #8). He's the Chuck Norris of Android development, with over 300,000 StackOverflow reputation points. I am honored by his decision to accept my offer to join the AndroidPolice team of contributors.
The User Defense series of posts will highlight relatively easy ways in which users can improve the privacy and security of their use of Android devices.
People sometimes worry about so-called "tracking cookies" that allow marketers to effectively spy on their Web surfing. Your smartphone is more or less a tracking cookie for the physical world, with everything from shopping malls to recycling bins tracking your movements.
Needless to say, some find this to be unnerving. Switching to airplane mode, or turning off your phone, in theory will stop this tracking. However, turning a phone off and on is rather slow, andthere are concerns over whether everything truly shuts off in either case.
The OFF Pocket tries to address this.
Just as RFID-blocking wallets are designed to help secure your credit cards and such, accessories like the OFF Pocket aim to do the same for your smartphone. Simply sliding the phone into the OFF Pocket's sleeve is supposed to block all signals: WiFi, cellular, and GPS.
image
The OFF Pocket, like many new accessories, is coming from a Kickstarter campaign, led by designers with past experience in anti-surveillance products, such as the anti-drone hoodie.
(Yes, there's an anti-drone hoodie.)
The OFF Pocket campaign has already met its funding goal of $35,000, with two weeks to go.
The makers of the OFF Pocket claim 100dB drop in signal strength (translation: it blocks signals really well), and it is certainly more convenient than carrying around a cocktail shaker or refrigerator for shielding your phone. On the other hand, it would be nice if there were a bit more independent testing of these claims, as at $85 for new Kickstarter backers, it is not inexpensive. With the right apps, it would be possible for a buyer to make some basic confirmations about signal strength as seen by the pocketed device, but, of course, that would be after the OFF Pocket was purchased.
The OFF Pocket will come in two sizes, with the larger size being suitable for a wide range of Android phones, though it's unclear if it will be large enough for phablets like the Samsung Galaxy Note series.
The OFF Pocket is not the first product of its kind, as Disklabs Faraday Bags, among others, has had similar products for a while, making similar claims. However, the OFF Pocket happens to be arriving on the scene at an interesting time.
Ideally, these sorts of accessories would not be needed. That being said, the OFF Pocket and similar products should offer device owners greater control over when their device is visible to the world and, therefore, subject to tracking.

Google Maps places ads in search results: annoying or justified?

Google has recently integrated ads right into their free service, Google Maps. Even apps belonging to the huge conglomerate are not immune to cancellation, as we recently experienced with Google Reader. Though I don't think this would happen in a million years, this could be a way for the loved service to reduce their chances of joining the cemetery of scrapped projects, like Google Health and Google Talk. Is this simply a way of monetizing Maps to keep it afloat or just a major pain in the derriere because the ads, which are presented first in the results list, might not be the cheapest or closest ones to your present location. 
maps ads2
 © adwords
The ads will be clearly labeled and function exactly like anything else Maps searches bring up. This means you pull it up to see the company details which include phone number, website and directions. These ads will appear when you input a query for any sort of general business. Google's argument is that they will only post these when it seems like it is relevant to the user's current location or search entry. That being said, the ad result could potentially not be your best possible option for the nearest service to you. This new campaign is in addition to the highlighted businesses that Google places on its maps once that company has paid them to do so.
Is this really helpful for the user though? In a funny joke I read today, they described the relationship between Google and you, stating that since you aren't actually paying for the service, you're not actually its customer and in fact, you're the product. Google uses your search entries and location to try and sell you stuff, which we've been aware of for a long time. Now they’re just doing it a little more overtly.
Do these new ads make you cringe or is it just the next logical step in mobile monetization?